Court of Appeals of Maryland· 9/30/1986
Jones v. State
Citations
- 514 A.2d 1219
- 307 Md. 449
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that § 12-702(b) codified the constitutional doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969) and adopting “significant portions of the Pearce language.”
- Section 12-702(b) “adopted not only the Pearce doctrine but also significant portions of the Pearce language as the statutory policy of Maryland.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-24· cited 76×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-05-14· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. HyattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-04-04· cited 39×
- Twigg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-03-28· cited 37×
- Miller v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-29· cited 27×
- Cathcart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-09· cited 18×
- State v. EnriquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-24· cited 18×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-30· cited 13×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-09· cited 13×
- COLKLEY & FIELDS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-26· cited 8×
- Coley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-06· cited 4×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-28· cited 2×
- Willey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-05
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
- Mills v. RogersSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 258×
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-13· cited 186×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
- Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-09· cited 88×
- Sweetwine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-08-12· cited 60×
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-10· cited 34×
- In Re Ramont K.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-06· cited 23×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.