Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/24/2011

Gardner v. State

Citations

  • 20 A.3d 801
  • 420 Md. 1
  • 2011 Md. LEXIS 304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in resolving ambiguities, we consider “the structure of the statute, how it relates to other laws, its general purpose and relative rationality and legal effect of various competing constructions[]” (quoting State v. Johnson, 415 Md. 413, 421–22 (2010))
  • explaining that in resolving ambiguities, we consider “the structure of the statute, how it relates to other laws, its general purpose and relative rationality and legal effect of various competing constructions[]” (quoting State v. Johnson, 415 Md. 413, 421–22 (2010))
  • “Petitioner, as he is entitled to do, noted an appeal from the judgments of conviction and sought review of the sentence by a three-judge panel[.]”
  • “[W]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another . . ., it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” (quoting Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 208 (1993))
  • “[W]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another . . ., it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” (quoting Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 208 (1993))
  • “[W]here Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another . . ., it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.” (quoting Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 208 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.