Reisch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a railroad land taxation ballot question was properly submitted because the law was “fairly expressed in the question submitted”
• explaining that courts may not review the language of a ballot question prescribed by the Legislature for a proposed statutory change “simply because” the courts may believe “the question was not phrased in the best or fairest terms”
• upholding ballot question as constitutional because the “clear and essential purpose” of the statute was “fairly expressed in the question submitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).