Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/19/1989
Brewer v. State
Citations
- 444 N.W.2d 77
- 1989 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 191
- 1989 WL 79636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure of prosecution- to reveal complete details of star witness’s grant of immunity was not a Brady violation in part because the evidence was not material
- adopting Teague’s holding that “new constitutional rules of criminal procedure generally should not be applied retroactively to cases on collateral review”
- relying on Teague framework to determine whether the Court’s holding in Duren, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S. Ct. 664, should be given retroactive effect to a case on collateral review
- “[W]e will not reverse where counsel has made a reasonable decision concerning trial tactics and strategy, even if such judgments ultimately fail.”
- considering retroactivity of Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, Larson, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1993-04-21· cited 202×
- People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-26· cited 170×
- Sergio Perez v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2012-06-08· cited 101×
- State v. RomeoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-01-17· cited 58×
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-06· cited 52×
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-05-25· cited 49×
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-04-21· cited 48×
- Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-03-17· cited 41×
- State v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-01-19· cited 38×
- Irving v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-06-21· cited 23×
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-11-20· cited 19×
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-04-17· cited 18×
- Ronald Wayne Brewer v. Crispus NixEighth Circuit· 1992-05-08· cited 15×
- Ronald Wayne Brewer v. State of IowaEighth Circuit· 1994-03-24· cited 14×
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-05-13· cited 12×
- Adcock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1994-12-14· cited 8×
- Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-10-27· cited 8×
- Greiman v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1991-06-19· cited 7×
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1996-10-25· cited 6×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-02-19· cited 5×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Daniel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-27· cited 232×
- Anderson v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 152×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-07-18· cited 134×
- Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-03-19· cited 120×
- Fryer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 105×
- State v. MilesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-02-15· cited 59×
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-11-17· cited 57×
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-05-21· cited 46×
- Stanford v. Iowa State ReformatorySupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-05-30· cited 40×
- Wycoff v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-02-19· cited 34×
- Henderson v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-12-23· cited 29×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-07-20· cited 27×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-07-22· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.