Idaho Supreme Court· 3/17/2010
Rhoades v. State
Citations
- 233 P.3d 61
- 149 Idaho 130
- 2010 Ida. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because comity concerns do not apply to state court’s review of state convictions, Idaho courts are ‘‘not required to blindly follow [the United States Supreme Court’s] view of . . . whether a new rule is a watershed rule’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horton, Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Trout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-12-07· cited 531×
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
- State v. Dameniel Preston OwensIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-02-09· cited 71×
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-09-13· cited 62×
- State v. LuteIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-04-20· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. SylvainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-09-13· cited 52×
- Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-11-20· cited 50×
- State v. MaresWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-10-09· cited 47×
- Timothy Alan Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2015-11-02· cited 42×
- Rhoades v. HenryNinth Circuit· 2010-07-15· cited 41×
- Venable v. Internet Auto Rent & Sales, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-06-17· cited 21×
- State v. Charlynda GogginIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-08-22· cited 19×
- Fields v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-01-06· cited 17×
- Melaleuca, Inc. v. FoellerIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-07· cited 8×
- Hooley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-10-27· cited 8×
- Tatum v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-16· cited 7×
- State v. Gutierrez-MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
- Hairston v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-09-03· cited 5×
- Christopher F. F. Hopper v. Joseph F. and Bette P. HopperIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-11-26· cited 4×
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 2,419×
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 1,348×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,054×
- Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 1,014×
- Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-02-13· cited 962×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 816×
- Butler v. McKellarSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 557×
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 472×
- Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 416×
- State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court· 1978-07-17· cited 302×
- Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1990-12-21· cited 248×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.