Skip to main content

Rhoades v. State

Citations

  • 233 P.3d 61
  • 149 Idaho 130
  • 2010 Ida. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because comity concerns do not apply to state court’s review of state convictions, Idaho courts are ‘‘not required to blindly follow [the United States Supreme Court’s] view of . . . whether a new rule is a watershed rule’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Trout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.