Anderson v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering “the magnitude of the prejudicial effect of the remark” and “the strength of the evidence of the defendant’s guilt”
• considering “the magnitude of the prejudicial effect of the remark” and “the strength of the evidence of the defendant’s guilt”
• Griffin error is harmless 14 unless “such comment is extensive, where an inference of guilt from silence is stressed to the jury 15 as a basis of conviction, and where there is evidence that could have supported acquittal”
• prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's failure to testify
• comment covering two pages of the Supreme Court Reporter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).