State v. Romeo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \[e]vidence that may be used to impeach a witness's credibility is included in [ Brady ] rule\
• holding “[ejvidence that may be used to impeach a witness’s credibility is included in [Brady ] rule”
• conducting a de novo review of due process claim based on a Brady violation
• conducting a de novo review of due process claim based on a Brady violation
• rejecting insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim despite inconsistencies in the testimony of the two primary witnesses against the defendant, holding it was for the jury to decide if the witnesses were credible
• rejecting insufficiency-of-the-evidence-claim despite inconsistencies in the testimony of the two primary witnesses against the defendant, holding it was for the jury to decide if the witnesses were credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).