Adcock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• outlining what a PCR applicant must prove to prevail on a claim of newly discovered evidence and noting “[a] witness’s recantation testimony is looked upon with the utmost suspicion”
• “The supreme court has repeatedly held that a witness’ recantation testimony is looked upon with the utmost suspicion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of Iowa
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2018-03-23· cited 226×
• Loren David Bailey v. Terry Mapes
  Eighth Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 1×
• Terry Linn Johnston, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-08-05
• Shain Matthew Malloy, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-05-25
• Brett Andrew Gilden v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2023-12-06
• Tyler Qualice Chandler v. State of Iowa
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2025-08-06

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1991-12-24· cited 121×
• State v. Folck
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 60×
• Brewer v. State
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1989-07-19· cited 52×
• State v. Dickerson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-12-23· cited 49×
• Stanford v. Iowa State Reformatory
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1979-05-30· cited 40×
• Earnest v. State
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1993-11-24· cited 31×
• Overton v. State
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-12-23· cited 25×
• Frank v. State
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1985-08-29· cited 5×
• Carroll v. State
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1990-12-27· cited 4×