· 5/31/2001
Alcantar v. Oklahoma National Bank
Citations
- 47 S.W.3d 815
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 3663
- 2001 WL 579903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding terms of oral settlement agreement announced to judge by telephone and later incorporated in judgment not in compliance with Rule 11
- holding terms of oral settlement agreement announced to judge by telephone and later incorporated in judgment not in compliance with Rule 11
- holding terms of oral settlement agreement announced to judge by telephone and later incorporated in judgment not in compliance with Rule 11
- stating that once the trial court renders judgment based on the parties’ settlement agreement, the parties cannot revoke their consent to the agreement
- stating that once the trial court renders judgment based on the parties = settlement agreement, the parties cannot revoke their consent to the agreement
- stating that once the trial court renders judgment based on the parties’ settlement agreement, the parties cannot revoke their consent to the agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.