Skip to main content
· 6/21/2001

Cadle Co. v. Lobingier

Citations

  • 50 S.W.3d 662
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 4083
  • 2001 WL 695133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that criminal contempt order constitutes “an exertion of the court’s inherent power to punish”
  • agreeing that court of appeals had no jurisdiction to review contempt order on appeal
  • agreeing that court of appeals had no jurisdiction to review contempt order on appeal
  • noting in criminal contempt proceedings “no subsequent voluntary compliance can enable the contemnor to avoid punishment.”
  • stating that, once imposed, contemnor cannot avoid punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Richards, Holman, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.