· 6/21/2001
Cadle Co. v. Lobingier
Citations
- 50 S.W.3d 662
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 4083
- 2001 WL 695133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that criminal contempt order constitutes “an exertion of the court’s inherent power to punish”
- agreeing that court of appeals had no jurisdiction to review contempt order on appeal
- agreeing that court of appeals had no jurisdiction to review contempt order on appeal
- noting in criminal contempt proceedings “no subsequent voluntary compliance can enable the contemnor to avoid punishment.”
- stating that, once imposed, contemnor cannot avoid punishment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day, Richards, Holman, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.