Osborn v. Osborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that husband’s suit for personal injuries was his separate property and reversing trial court’s community property finding
• stating that presumption no longer taken as true if rebutted by other evidence in record
• defendant did not show that his failure to attend trial was unintentional when he took the stand at hearing but never testified that he did not receive notice
• recitation of due notice of trial setting in judgment constitutes some evidence that proper notice was given; law presumes that trial court hears case only after proper notice to parties unless record shows otherwise
• “On remand, the trial court is required to properly characterize the damages sought by the personal injury 25 lawsuit . . . . [T]he damages for [the wife’s] claim for loss of consortium are her separate property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).