Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/22/2004
Raby Construction, L.L.P. v. Orr
Citations
- 594 S.E.2d 478
- 358 S.C. 10
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 65
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that in order to be entitled to relief due to fraud, the party seeking such relief must establish extrinsic rather than intrinsic fraud
- holding the appellant was not entitled to relief for any alleged fraud or misrepresentation because the evidence that was presented in the motion for relief from judgment could have been discovered during the litigation
- stating appellate review of the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion \is limited to determining whether there was an abuse of discretion\
- stating allegations of perjury, failure to produce requested discovery, or use of forged documents amount only to intrinsic fraud
- stating appellate review \is limited to determining whether there was an abuse of discretion\
- stating a party may not prevail on a Rule 60(b)(3) motion on the basis of fraud when he or she has access to disputed information or has knowledge of inaccuracies in an opponent's representations at the time of the alleged misconduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Brogdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lanier v. LanierCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 38×
- Gainey v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-03-04· cited 30×
- Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-19· cited 27×
- RRR, INC. v. ToggasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-23· cited 19×
- Ray v. RaySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-25· cited 16×
- Spivey Ex Rel. Spivey v. Carolina CrawlerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-11-28· cited 10×
- Belle Hall Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-02-08· cited 9×
- SOUTHEASTERN HOUSING FOUNDATION v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-12· cited 8×
- Tobias v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-10· cited 6×
- Stearns Bank National Ass'n v. Glenwood Falls, LPSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-11-05· cited 5×
- Curry v. Carolina Insurance Group of SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- Gladys Ojeda-Toro v. Mario E. Rivera-MendezFirst Circuit· 1988-08-03· cited 48×
- Chewning v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 41×
- Coleman Ex Rel. Coleman v. DunlapSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-06· cited 40×
- Bowman v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-20· cited 35×
- Mr. G v. Mrs. GCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 26×
- Bryan v. BRYANSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-08-29· cited 21×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 16×
- In Re Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationFifth Circuit· 1991-08-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.