Skip to main content

Ray v. Ray

Citations

  • 647 S.E.2d 237
  • 374 S.C. 79
  • 2007 S.C. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a party's concealment of marital assets and intentional delay of a payment from an investment, coupled with a showing that party \acted with an intent to deceive or defraud the court\ justified relief under Rule 60(b)(3) (quotation omitted)
  • concluding that a party’s concealment of marital assets and intentional delay of a payment from an investment, coupled with a showing that party “acted with an intent to deceive or defraud the court” justified relief under Rule 60(b)(3) (quotation omitted)
  • holding nondisclosure of assets during dissolution proceeding constitutes extrinsic fraud
  • holding nondisclosure of assets during dissolution proceeding constitutes extrinsic fraud
  • “Generally speaking, only the most egregious misconduct . . . in which an attorney is implicated will constitute fraud on the court.”
  • wife committed fraud on court by misrepresenting existence of marital assets in court-ordered accounting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Pleicones, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.