Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “in consequence of discovery misconduct, the challenged behavior must substantially have interfered with the aggrieved party’s ability fully and fairly to prepare for and proceed at trial”
• noting that \the documents themselves may constitute clear and convincing proof that no prejudice inured\
• directing that hearings after remand be held before Judge Skinner because of his “intimate knowledge of the case and [mastery of] its factual intricacies”
• noting that parties “ought not to be allowed to base an appeal on the ambiguities and omissions that were the natural consequence of their strategy”
• noting that relief may be proper despite the fact that the trial court found the disclosure of the report would have had no effect on .the result at trial
• implying that “misconduct” under Rule 60(b)(3) concerns misconduct between the parties during the course of litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).