Second Circuit· 12/1/1994

Bossett v. Walker

Citations

41 F.3d 825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that petitioner did not satisfy the cause and prejudice showing where he did not give any reason for failing to properly exhaust his federal claim in state 15 court
applying the contemporaneous objection rule as a procedural bar to federal habeas review
“To fulfill the exhaustion requirement, a petitioner must have presented the substance of his federal claims ‘to the highest court of the pertinent state.’”
“To fulfill the exhaustion requirement, a petitioner must'have presented the substance of his federal claims ‘to the highest court of the pertinent state.’ ”
“Cause may be demonstrated with ‘a showing . . . [that] the procedural default is the result of ineffective assistance of counsel.’” (quoting Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 488 (1986))
“The appropriate standard of review for a claim of prosecutorial misconduct on a writ of habeas corpus is the narrow one of due process, and not the broad exercise of supervisory power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Skretny, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.