Second Circuit· 9/26/2000
Lurie v. Wittner
Citations
- 228 F.3d 113
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23792
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting First Circuit rule that federal courts cannot apply Rule of Lenity to state statute unless it is unconstitutionally vague or otherwise fails to give fair notice
- “Even relevant testimony can be excluded, depending upon circumstances, without offending due process.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edwards v. FischerS.D. New York· 2006-02-07· cited 311×
- Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 2001-06-15· cited 161×
- United States v. Carlos GarciaSecond Circuit· 2002-05-17· cited 161×
- Carvajal v. ArtusSecond Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 144×
- Ponnapula v. SpitzerSecond Circuit· 2002-07-26· cited 99×
- Ortiz v. N.Y.S. Parole in Bronx, N.Y.Second Circuit· 2009-11-10· cited 20×
- Durant v. StrackE.D. New York· 2001-06-19· cited 13×
- Alli-Balogun v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2015-07-15· cited 12×
- MacKenzie v. PortuondoE.D. New York· 2002-05-20· cited 11×
- Demetrius Smith v. Lorie Davis, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2019-06-13· cited 9×
- Rustici v. PhillipsSecond Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 7×
- Nitke v. AshcroftS.D. New York· 2003-03-24· cited 6×
- Linnen v. PooleW.D. New York· 2011-02-04· cited 3×
- Sims v. StinsonSecond Circuit· 2001-03-28· cited 3×
- Simms v. LaClairW.D. New York· 2011-01-06· cited 2×
- Hickman v. NashSecond Circuit· 2001-04-18· cited 2×
- Young v. ZonW.D. New York· 2011-02-18· cited 2×
- Lewis v. DUFRAINW.D. New York· 2005-10-13· cited 1×
- Santorelli v. CowheyS.D. New York· 2000-12-08· cited 1×
- Linnen v. PooleW.D. New York· 2010-02-24· cited 1×
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 2,149×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- United States v. BassSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 1,739×
- Castille v. PeoplesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,587×
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 1,218×
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 890×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.