Renaldo Grey v. Robert Hoke, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two claims discussed in petitioner's Appellate Division brief but not identified in his letter application to the Court of Appeals were procedurally defaulted
• holding that the petitioner met his statutory exhaustion requirement because he no longer had \remedies available\ in New York
• holding that petitioner failed to preserve for habeas review those claims raised in appellate brief attached to application for leave to appeal but not mentioned in the application letter itself
• holding that petitioner’s failure to present to the highest court constitutional questions relating to, among other things, counsel’s failure to raise prosecutorial misconduct precluded federal habeas review
• holding that petitioner’s failure to present to the highest court constitutional questions relating to counsel’s failure to raise prosecutorial misconduct and improper sentencing precluded federal habeas review
• holding that New York procedural rules “plainly bar” petitioner from raising claims because he did not raise them when he “made the one request for leave to appeal to which he is entitled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).