Supreme Court· 5/15/1989
Castille v. Peoples
Citations
- 489 U.S. 346
- 109 S. Ct. 1056
- 103 L. Ed. 2d 380
- 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that presentation of claims to a State’s highest court on discretionary review does not satisfy exhaustion requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
- holding that presentation of claims to a State’s highest court on discretionary review does not satisfy exhaustion requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
- holding that “the submission of a new claim to a State’s highest court on discretionary review” does not constitute a fair presentation of that claim for exhaustion purposes
- holding that using a state procedure that is discretionary and limited in scope is not fair presentation
- holding that raising claim for first time in procedural context where consideration of merits is discretionary does not satisfy federal exhaustion requirement
- holding that a claim remains unexhausted when it is raised for the first time on discretionary review to the state’s highest court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scalia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
440 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 8,220×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court· 1991-06-24· cited 2,430×
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 1,588×
- Horton v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-03-04· cited 579×
- Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 547×
- Lebere v. AbbottTenth Circuit· 2013-10-18· cited 532×
- Ward v. HallEleventh Circuit· 2010-01-04· cited 525×
- James Perruquet v. Kenneth R. BrileySeventh Circuit· 2004-11-17· cited 441×
- Peter Lewis v. Jerry SternesSeventh Circuit· 2004-12-06· cited 420×
- Russell L. O'Bremski v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 1990-09-25· cited 391×
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayNinth Circuit· 1995-09-05· cited 371×
- Renaldo Grey v. Robert Hoke, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1991-05-09· cited 340×
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-08-30· cited 330×
- John Henry Casey v. Robert MooreNinth Circuit· 2004-10-12· cited 307×
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 290×
- Aparicio v. ArtuzSecond Circuit· 2001-10-30· cited 287×
- Aparicio v. ArtuzSecond Circuit· 2001-10-05· cited 277×
- Snowden v. SingletaryEleventh Circuit· 1998-02-18· cited 264×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court· 1982-03-08· cited 5,808×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,714×
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,175×
- Pitchess v. DavisSupreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 214×
- Smith v. DigmonSupreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 167×
- Robert Chaussard v. Thomas Fulcomer, Warden Appeal of Robert W. ChaussardThird Circuit· 1987-04-27· cited 25×
- Peoples (Michael) v. Fulcomer (Thomas), Attorney General State of Pennsylvania, District Attorney of Philadelphia CountyThird Circuit· 1987-12-30· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. PeoplesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-16· cited 1×
Other cases named Castille v. Peoples
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.