· 8/20/2009
Gomez v. Brown
Citations
- 655 F. Supp. 2d 332
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74030
- 2009 WL 2575916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
- noting that, with respect to “uncontested portions of a report and recommendation, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hon, Baer, Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.