Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 8/28/1996
Booze v. State
Citations
- 681 A.2d 534
- 111 Md. App. 208
- 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defense counsel “opened the door” to the State’s rebuttal remarks when defense counsel raised the issue in his closing argument
- “The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge’s exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.”
- “The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge’s exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.”
- \The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge's exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wenner, Salmon, Eyler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-04-16· cited 47×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-24· cited 39×
- Jeffries v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-29· cited 36×
- Whitney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-09· cited 17×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- Booze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-08-26· cited 13×
- Wisneski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-12· cited 11×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-26· cited 10×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-29· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-15· cited 7×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-10· cited 87×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-16· cited 84×
- Gilchrist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-28· cited 65×
- Rainville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-11-06· cited 55×
- Guesfeird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-24· cited 53×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
- Ebb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-13· cited 42×
- Mejia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-09· cited 41×
- State v. BoozeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 28×
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-02-14· cited 25×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-30· cited 24×
- Stockton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-22· cited 17×
- Hairston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-08· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.