Skip to main content
· 8/28/1996

Booze v. State

Citations

  • 681 A.2d 534
  • 111 Md. App. 208
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel “opened the door” to the State’s rebuttal remarks when defense counsel raised the issue in his closing argument
  • “The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge’s exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.”
  • “The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge’s exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.”
  • \The trial judge has wide discretion with respect to what counsel may say during closing argument and the trial judge's exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly abused and prejudicial to the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wenner, Salmon, Eyler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.