Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 8/30/1995
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 106 Md. App. 24
- 664 A.2d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- comparing “well considered, well researched, and well analyzed instances of even deliberate and conscious dicta ” with “careless, casual, and passing instances of the most obiter of dicta”
- automatic prerogative of police during lawful traffic stop to order motorist out of vehicle does not extend to passengers, absent some individualized or particularized suspicion
- “[S]tare decisis is ill served if readers hang slavishly on every casual or hurried word as if it had bubbled from the earth at Delphi”
- “It is ... the officer who must do the articulating, not the Attorney General by way of appellate afterthought.”
- because the prosecutor's comments were not improper, counsel was not ineffective forfailing to object
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-03· cited 174×
- Edmonds v. Cytology Services of Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-29· cited 25×
- Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-13· cited 25×
- Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-25· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-06-17· cited 17×
- McKoy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-06-30· cited 14×
- Booze v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-28· cited 13×
- R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-01-29· cited 12×
- Golub v. CohenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-05-03· cited 8×
- Broadwater v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-27· cited 6×
- Bryan v. STATE ROADS COMMISSION OF STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATIONCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-02· cited 6×
- Kulikov v. Baffoe-HardingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-21· cited 5×
- Heinlein v. StefanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-29· cited 2×
- Moultrie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29· cited 1×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-04-04
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-05-06
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- New York v. ClassSupreme Court· 1986-02-25· cited 728×
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals· 1989-07-11· cited 184×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-01-26· cited 107×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-01· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. PollardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 78×
- State v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-10-21· cited 64×
- Derricott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-26· cited 51×
- People v. McLaurinNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-10-13· cited 48×
- State v. EisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-05-16· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. MimmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 39×
- State v. FerriseSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-08-18· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.