Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/12/2006
Wisneski v. State
Citations
- 905 A.2d 385
- 169 Md. App. 527
- 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
- deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
- although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private
- although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wisneski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-18· cited 14×
- State v. PUTZICourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-03-04· cited 5×
- GENIES v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-28· cited 4×
- State of Arizona v. Roger PutziCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-03-04
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25
- State v. PaytonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-01
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-09-27
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-10· cited 64×
- State v. HeppleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-01· cited 55×
- Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-17· cited 53×
- Messina v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-04-05· cited 42×
- McGee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-02-14· cited 29×
- State v. BoozeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-03-11· cited 28×
- Hepple v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-04· cited 26×
- Hayes v. Mountain Comprehensive Care CenterSupreme Court· 2001-01-16· cited 24×
- Dyson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-04· cited 23×
- People v. LegelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1974-12-18· cited 23×
- Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-06-03· cited 21×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-10-17· cited 19×
- Dill v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-02-21· cited 19×
- Spillers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-01-07· cited 18×
- State v. SousaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1964-04-02· cited 18×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-04-17· cited 16×
- Greene v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-14· cited 15×
- State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-02-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.