Skip to main content

Zeifman v. Michels

Citations

  • 212 S.W.3d 582
  • 2006 WL 2190525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court is vested with discretion because it is best able to observe witnesses’ demeanor and personalities
  • “Increase in age alone is not a changed circumstance to justify modification unless changed needs are shown.”
  • trial court “is best able to observe the witnesses’ demeanor and personalities”
  • in modification proceeding, “a threshold inquiry of the trial court is whether the moving party has met the burden . . . of showing a material and substantial change; otherwise the trial court must deny the motion to modify”
  • “To prove that a material change in circumstances has occurred, the petitioner must demonstrate what conditions existed at the time of the entry of the prior order as compared to the circumstances existing at the time of the hearing on the motion to modify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Law, Patterson, Pemberton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

291 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zeifman v. Michels

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.