Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 8/30/2006
Zeifman v. Michels
Citations
- 212 S.W.3d 582
- 2006 WL 2190525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court is vested with discretion because it is best able to observe witnesses’ demeanor and personalities
- “Increase in age alone is not a changed circumstance to justify modification unless changed needs are shown.”
- trial court “is best able to observe the witnesses’ demeanor and personalities”
- in modification proceeding, “a threshold inquiry of the trial court is whether the moving party has met the burden . . . of showing a material and substantial change; otherwise the trial court must deny the motion to modify”
- “To prove that a material change in circumstances has occurred, the petitioner must demonstrate what conditions existed at the time of the entry of the prior order as compared to the circumstances existing at the time of the hearing on the motion to modify.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Law, Patterson, Pemberton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
291 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- in the Interest of A.L.E.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-12· cited 219×
- In the Interest of A.B.P.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-06-17· cited 168×
- Kirk Brand Coburn v. Janet MorelandTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-05-23· cited 146×
- in the Interest of C.A.M.M.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-10-30· cited 71×
- Swaab v. SwaabTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-11-20· cited 69×
- in the Interest of S.A.H, a Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-01-28· cited 63×
- Stamper v. KnoxTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-03-20· cited 59×
- Zeifman v. NowlinTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2010-08-27· cited 50×
- Smith v. KaranjaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-02-08· cited 39×
- Iliff v. IliffTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-07-21· cited 38×
- In the Interest of T.M.P. and J.C.P., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2013-08-28· cited 37×
- Blackwell v. HumbleTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-12-14· cited 34×
- Zeifman v. MichelsTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-06-20· cited 33×
- in the Interest of E.R.C., a Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2016-06-14· cited 31×
- Elizabeth M. Trammell v. Fletcher v. Trammell, Sr.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-02-02· cited 28×
- Westview Drive Investments, LLC and Jack Yetiv v. Landmark American Insurance Co., and King-Phillips Insurance Agency, Inc. AKA Insurtrust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-02-28· cited 27×
- Child v. LevertonTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-09-21· cited 26×
- in the Interest of C.H.C. a ChildTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-02-06· cited 21×
- Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-08-02· cited 21×
- Thomas Mark Richardson v. Julie Ana RichardsonTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2014-02-05· cited 20×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 2005-06-10· cited 10,088×
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-01· cited 4,606×
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court· 1986-02-12· cited 4,555×
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 3,003×
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 1,831×
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 1,485×
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 1,132×
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court· 1992-06-17· cited 1,117×
- Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court· 1983-11-02· cited 1,105×
- Gillespie v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 991×
- In the Interest of V.L.K.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-06-22· cited 474×
- Cherne Industries, Inc. v. MagallanesTexas Supreme Court· 1989-01-25· cited 403×
- K-Mart Corp. v. HoneycuttTexas Supreme Court· 2000-06-29· cited 342×
- Vickery v. Commission for Lawyer DisciplineTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-18· cited 301×
- Tenery v. TeneryTexas Supreme Court· 1996-11-15· cited 290×
- In the Interest of T.D.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-21· cited 275×
- Lindsey v. LindseyTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1998-02-26· cited 215×
- Echols v. OlivarezTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-08-30· cited 213×
- Bates v. TesarTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-06-06· cited 150×
Other cases named Zeifman v. Michels
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.