Skip to main content
· 2/27/2009

Retamco Operating, Inc. v. Republic Drilling Co.

Citations

  • 278 S.W.3d 333
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 395
  • 171 Oil & Gas Rep. 266
  • 2009 Tex. LEXIS 38
  • 2009 WL 490063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suit arose from alleged fraudulent transfer of real property located in Texas even though the allegedly fraudulent assignment occurred in California
  • holding that suit arose from alleged fraudulent transfer of real property located in Texas even though the allegedly fraudulent assignment occurred in California
  • concluding that defendant went “well beyond answering a phone call from a Texas resident or shipping goods to Texas”
  • holding that specific jurisdiction was proved when nonresident defendants purchased property interests in Texas even while not physically present in the state and substantial connection existed between contacts and litigation
  • reasoning that the minimum contacts analysis is focused on the quality and nature of the defendant’s contacts, rather than their number
  • reasoning that the minimum contacts analysis is focused on the quality and nature of the defendant's contacts, rather than their number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.