Spir Star AG v. Kimich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exercising jurisdiction over nonresident requires some additional conduct that indicates an intent or purpose to serve the market in the forum State
• holding that exercising jurisdiction over nonresident requires some additional conduct that indicates an intent or purpose to serve the market in the forum State
• concluding that the plus requirement was satisfied where the defendant specifically targeted Houston’s market
• holding that “establishing channels for providing regular advice to customers in the forum State” can serve as the necessary evidence to demonstrate that a nonresident seller intended to serve the Texas market
• holding that exercising jurisdiction over nonresident requires “some ‘additional conduct’—beyond merely placing the product in the stream of commerce—that indicates ‘an intent or purpose to serve the market in the forum State’”
• holding that “establishing channels for providing regular advice to customers in the forum State” can serve as the necessary evidence to demonstrate that a nonresident seller intended to serve the Texas market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).