Second Circuit· 3/15/1993
Block v. First Blood Associates
Citations
- 988 F.2d 344
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 264
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4852
- 1993 WL 69747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
- concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
- holding that “solely . . . time, effort and money . . . expended in litigating” did not constitute prejudice
- concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
- concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
- concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miner, Pierce, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Curtis Long v. Harry Wilson, SuperintendentThird Circuit· 2004-12-29· cited 314×
- Cho v. BlackBerry Ltd.Second Circuit· 2021-03-11· cited 176×
- Nurriddin v. GoldinDistrict of Columbia· 2005-08-17· cited 136×
- Monahan v. New York City Department Of CorrectionsSecond Circuit· 2000-06-08· cited 117×
- Agerbrink v. Model Service LLCS.D. New York· 2016-01-07· cited 116×
- Pasternack v. ShraderSecond Circuit· 2017-07-13· cited 106×
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 93×
- Tafari v. McCarthyN.D. New York· 2010-05-24· cited 85×
- Soroof Trading Development Co. v. Ge Microgen, Inc.S.D. New York· 2012-05-11· cited 75×
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.S.D. New York· 2010-01-08· cited 74×
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-02-28· cited 73×
- Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York v. Phase Construction Services, Inc.S.D. New York· 2016-11-30· cited 67×
- Vona v. County Of NiagaraSecond Circuit· 1997-07-23· cited 52×
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.Second Circuit· 2016-10-17· cited 47×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,789 Robert Eckstein v. Balcor Film InvestorsSeventh Circuit· 1995-07-21· cited 44×
- Moorer v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.E.D. New York· 1997-05-19· cited 43×
- United States ex rel. Raffington v. Bon Secours Health Sys., Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-01-25· cited 38×
- Town of New Windsor v. Tesa Tuck, Inc.S.D. New York· 1996-03-14· cited 37×
- Johnson v. Bryco ArmsE.D. New York· 2004-02-03· cited 32×
- Contrera v. LangerS.D. Illinois· 2018-06-04· cited 31×
Other cases named Block v. First Blood Associates
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1988-07-06· cited 21×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1989-03-16· cited 10×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1987-06-09· cited 9×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1991-04-30· cited 8×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1990-07-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.