Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/15/1993

Block v. First Blood Associates

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 344
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 264
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4852
  • 1993 WL 69747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
  • concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
  • holding that “solely . . . time, effort and money . . . expended in litigating” did not constitute prejudice
  • concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
  • concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice
  • concluding that the time, effort, and money expended by the plaintiffs in litigating the case did not amount to substantial prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Pierce, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Block v. First Blood Associates

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.