· 12/29/2004
Curtis Long v. Harry Wilson, Superintendent
Citations
- 393 F.3d 390
- 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 600
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27092
- 2004 WL 2997890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that PCRA petition had no effect on tolling because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
- holding that PCRA petition had no effect on tolling because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
- holding that PCRA petition had no effect on tolling because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
- holding that PCRA petition had no effect on tolling because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
- concluding that untimely PCRA petition did not toll statute of limitations because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
- finding that the PCRA petition had no effect on tolling because “the limitations period had already run when it was filed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scirica, Fisher, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.