Cho v. BlackBerry Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant was in privity with defendants in an earlier lawsuit where they all represented the same company within the scope of their employment
• holding that the named defendant was in privity with defendants named in an earlier lawsuit where each represented the same company within the scope of his employment
• affirming denial of motion seeking reconsideration based on new evidence because the evidence “was readily available at the time of the earlier briefing”
• res judicata “applies even where new claims are based on newly discovered evidence, unless the evidence was either fraudulently concealed or it could not have been discovered with due diligence” (quoting L-Tec Elecs., 198 F.3d at 88)
• “Privity bars relitigation of the same cause of action against a new defendant known by a plaintiff at the time of the first suit where the new defendant has a sufficiently close relationship to the original defendant to justify preclusion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• utilizing the same standard under Local Civil Rule 6.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hansen v. Miller
  Second Circuit· 2022-10-28· cited 25×
• The Wall Guy, Inc. v. FDIC
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-03-18· cited 12×
• In Re Shanda Games Ltd. SEC. Litig.
  Second Circuit· 2025-02-03· cited 12×
• Miller v. United States, Citibank, N.A.
  Second Circuit· 2024-08-06

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Gonzalez v. Thaler
  Supreme Court· 2012-01-10· cited 3,668×
• Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 2,470×
• Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 1,233×
• Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Trust
  Second Circuit· 2013-08-30· cited 761×
• United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 526×
• Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension Fund
  Supreme Court· 2015-03-24· cited 523×
• Block v. First Blood Associates
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-15· cited 379×
• Van Buskirk v. The United Group of Companies
  Second Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 368×
• California Public Employees' Retirement System v. ANZ Securities, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2017-06-26· cited 219×
• Edp Medical Computer Systems, Inc. v. United States of America, Docket No. 06-0106-Cv
  Second Circuit· 2007-03-09· cited 204×
• Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Celotex Corporation and U.S. Mineral Products Company, Dana Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1995-06-05· cited 180×
• Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v. Empresa Naviera Santa S.A.
  Second Circuit· 1995-05-17· cited 175×
• Rje Corp. v. Northville Industries Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2003-05-15· cited 109×
• L-Tec Electronics Corporation v. Cougar Electronic Organization, Inc. Sol Mayer and Dan Reich, Individually and D/B/A Cougar Electronic Organization
  Second Circuit· 1999-11-30· cited 91×
• In Re: Painewebber Limited Partnerships Litigation
  Second Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 89×
• Marrero Pichardo v. Ashcroft
  Second Circuit· 2004-07-01· cited 79×
• James Baylis, Cross-Appellees v. Marriott Corporation, Cross-Appellant
  Second Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 43×
• Cohen v. UBS Financial Services Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2015-06-30· cited 30×
• Massie v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
  Third Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 28×
• Bryan v. Credit Control, LLC
  Second Circuit· 2020-04-03· cited 16×