Contrera v. Langer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he Second Circuit has not squarely addressed whether common law claims for overtime are preempted by the FLSA”
• explaining that the Court of Appeals’ holding in Gottlieb supports the conclusion that Section 198 “does not stand alone,” but rather “sets forth the remedies available in actions for wage claims founded on substantive provisions of Labor Law article 6”
• finding defendant’s argument that “the passage of time may have caused witnesses’s memories of the events to deteriorate . . . insufficient to deny leave to amend”
• “No such dead- line has been set in this case, however. Parker is therefore inapposite.”
• “the party opposing the amendment bears the burden of showing prejudice, bad faith, and futility”
• “The remedies of section 198 may not be invoked when the claim is in substance a contract claim to enforce the payment of obligations other than statutory wages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Williams v. Epic Sec. Corp.
  S.D. Illinois· 2019-02-22· cited 28×

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Foman v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
• McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
• English v. General Electric Co.
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 1,390×
• Ruotolo v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 2008-02-06· cited 1,344×
• Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 976×
• Roth v. Jennings
  Second Circuit· 2007-06-06· cited 732×
• Harsco Corp. v. Segui
  Second Circuit· 1996-08-01· cited 509×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Defendants
  Second Circuit· 1981-06-22· cited 432×
• Block v. First Blood Associates
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-15· cited 379×
• Port Dock & Stone Corp. v. Oldcastle Northeast, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2007-10-23· cited 329×
• Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1973-07-30· cited 275×
• Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S. M. W. Development Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1968-04-02· cited 149×
• Ethelberth v. Choice Security Co.
  E.D. New York· 2015-02-27· cited 135×
• Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. MF Global, Ltd.
  Second Circuit· 2010-09-14· cited 101×
• Galper v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  Second Circuit· 2015-09-30· cited 93×
• Gottlieb v. Kenneth D. Laub & Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-23· cited 76×
• A v. by Versace, Inc. v. Gianni Versace, S.P.A.
  S.D. New York· 2000-03-06· cited 74×