Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/22/1982
Blankenship v. State
Citations
- 447 A.2d 428
- 1982 Del. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting the Larrison test previously adopted under Delaware law in Johnson v. State, 410 A.2d 1014 (Del. 1980)
- reaffirming the Larrison test as the standard for reviewing a motion for a new trial based on witness recantation, which the court previously adopted in Johnson v. State, 410 A.2d 1014 (Del. 1980)
- “The holding of an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of a Motion for a New Trial is within the discretion of the trial judge subject to review only for abuse of that discretion.”
- “A Motion for a New Trial based upon a witness’ recantation is generally viewed with suspicion, and a denial of such a motion will not be reversed on appeal unless there has been an abuse of discretion by the Trial Court.”
- “A Motion for a New Trial based upon a witness’ recantation is generally viewed with suspicion, and a denial of such a motion will not be reversed on appeal unless there has been an abuse of discretion by the Trial Court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, McNeilly, Quillen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2004-01-27· cited 55×
- Weedon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-04-14· cited 37×
- Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-02-09· cited 26×
- Downes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-03-30· cited 23×
- Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-06-01· cited 18×
- People v. SchneiderColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-01-18· cited 5×
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-09-29· cited 5×
- State of Delaware v. Wright.Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-08-19
- State of Delaware v. Simmers.Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-02-18
- State v. WhiteSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-11-21
- Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-06-17
- State v. AdkinsSuperior Court of Delaware· 2021-08-25
- State v. Evans, Jr.Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-10-08
- State v. MiltonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2021-10-12
- State v. WashingtonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2021-11-09
- State v. JusticeSuperior Court of Delaware· 2022-07-01
- State v. LaytonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2022-10-06
- State v. MillerSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-04-10
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-04-22
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 1,164×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 960×
- Larrison v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1928-01-07· cited 378×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1946-03-04· cited 361×
- Greenwald v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 326×
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1851-10-15· cited 277×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 242×
- Thompson v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1951-03-01· cited 137×
- Anonymous J. v. Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 133×
- United States v. James Walter ScottNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 86×
- Gordon v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1949-12-05· cited 84×
- Norton Edward Richardson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1966-05-12· cited 78×
- United States v. Keith Leon WallaceFourth Circuit· 1976-01-08· cited 75×
- United States v. Ernest C. Hamilton, Lloyd E. Hennigan, Jr., Philip J. Shaheen, Jr., and Henri LoridansFifth Circuit· 1977-10-03· cited 73×
- B. H. Newman v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1956-11-27· cited 71×
- United States v. Edmund RosnerSecond Circuit· 1975-04-29· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.