Skip to main content
· 4/14/2000

Weedon v. State

Citations

  • 750 A.2d 521
  • 2000 Del. LEXIS 153
  • 2000 WL 527805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an exception in the interest of justice under Rule 61(i)(4) where multiple witnesses recanted their testimony
  • noting exceptions to the law of the case doctrine when the “previous ruling was clearly in error or there was an important change in circumstances” or an “equitable concern of preventing injustice”
  • discussing witness recantation as a factual development for purposes of the exception
  • recantation of factual basis for hearsay exception may provide basis for different ruling notwithstanding the law of the case doctrine
  • recantation of factual basis for hearsay exception may provide basis for different ruling notwithstanding the law of the case doctrine
  • discussing the scope of the “interests of justice” exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Berger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.