Skip to main content

Cabrera v. State

Citations

  • 840 A.2d 1256
  • 2004 Del. LEXIS 58
  • 2004 WL 214279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • To satisfy the authentication requirement, the State need only “establish a rational basis from which the jury could conclude that the evidence is connected with the defendant.”
  • “The burden of authentication is easily met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yeasey, Veasey, Holland, Berger, Steele, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cabrera v. State

56 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.