Cabrera v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in order for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a sufficient temporal break between the two acts in order to allow the offender to reflect and form a new criminal intent for each offense
• holding that in order for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a sufficient temporal break between the two acts in order to allow the offender to reflect and form a new criminal intent for each offense
• holding that in order for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a sufficient temporal break between the two acts in order to allow the offender to reflect and form a new criminal intent for each offense
• holding that in order for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a temporal break between the two acts to allow the offender to reflect and form a new criminal intent for each offense
• holding that for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a sufficient temporal break between the two acts to allow the - 10 - defendant to form a new criminal intent for each offense
• holding that in order for crimes to be considered to have occurred in more than one criminal episode, there must be a sufficient temporal break between the two acts in order to allow the offender to reflect and form a new criminal intent for each offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).