Skip to main content
· 10/3/1977

United States v. Ernest C. Hamilton, Lloyd E. Hennigan, Jr., Philip J. Shaheen, Jr., and Henri Loridans

Citations

  • 559 F.2d 1370
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidentiary hearings may be warranted in cases “involving allegations of jury tampering, prosecutorial misconduct, or third party confession.”
  • “the acumen gained by a trial judge over the course of the proceedings made him well qualified to rule on the basis of affidavits without a hearing.”
  • “Where evidentiary hearings are ordered, it is because of certain unique situations typically involving allegations of jury tampering, prosecutorial misconduct, or 14 Case: 17-13085 Date Filed: 08/30/2018 Page: 15 of 15 third party confession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Kunzig, Gee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.