Skip to main content

Alston v. State

Citations

  • 554 A.2d 304
  • 1989 Del. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no inconsistent verdict given that the jury could have found that a co-conspirator committed the overt act
  • stating that “[p]romises or inducements . . . do not make a statement involuntary, unless so extravagant, or so impressionable as to overbear the person’s will and rational thinking process”
  • “Under section 521(a), if an individual conspires to commit several crimes, he is nonetheless guilty of only one conspiracy as long as the multiple crimes are the object of the same agreement.”
  • “the evidence shows only one agreement, viz., to rob whoever left the hotel that night. We agree that the multiple robbery offenses were the object of one agreement and thus may support only one conspiracy conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Moore, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.