Supreme Court of Delaware· 2/9/1989
Alston v. State
Citations
- 554 A.2d 304
- 1989 Del. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no inconsistent verdict given that the jury could have found that a co-conspirator committed the overt act
- stating that “[p]romises or inducements . . . do not make a statement involuntary, unless so extravagant, or so impressionable as to overbear the person’s will and rational thinking process”
- “Under section 521(a), if an individual conspires to commit several crimes, he is nonetheless guilty of only one conspiracy as long as the multiple crimes are the object of the same agreement.”
- “the evidence shows only one agreement, viz., to rob whoever left the hotel that night. We agree that the multiple robbery offenses were the object of one agreement and thus may support only one conspiracy conviction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Moore, Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harold S. Alston v. Walter Redman, Warden Charles M. Oberly, Iii, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and the State of DelawareThird Circuit· 1994-09-07· cited 136×
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
- Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-22· cited 66×
- Saucier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-04-25· cited 58×
- Gregory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-11-12· cited 39×
- McAllister v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-08-30· cited 38×
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-09-10· cited 33×
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-12-04· cited 29×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-08-11· cited 28×
- Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-06-16· cited 25×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-10-01· cited 25×
- People v. CrusoeMichigan Supreme Court· 1989-12-07· cited 21×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-01-26· cited 13×
- State v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Delaware· 1994-12-29· cited 9×
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-12-19
- State v. LopezSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-10-03
- State v. WhiteSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-08
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2020-12-10
- State v. CoyleSuperior Court of Delaware· 1989-09-29
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 1,013×
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 963×
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-11-09· cited 848×
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 824×
- United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzFirst Circuit· 1985-05-14· cited 170×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.