Loveday v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the law of the case doctrine because it \would thwart the purpose of [the statute that] grants power to this Court to review judgments of the Court of Special Appeals\
• declining to apply the law of the case doctrine because it “would thwart the purpose of [the statute that] grants power to this Court to review judgments of the Court of Special Appeals”
• in turn quoting Fidelity- Baltimore Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 217 Md. 367, 372, 142 A.2d 796 (1958)
• constitutionality of imposing more severe penalties on subsequent offenders “no longer open to challenge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).