Hillard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he law is well settled that, in the absence of any jurisdictional defect, [agreements between the State and an accused] are based on contract principles and must be enforced.”
• “Mandatory release under Corr. Serv. § 7-501, like parole, is uniquely an executive function and the enforcement and regulation thereof is vested solely within the Division of Parole and Probation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Luckett
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-14· cited 29×
• Rankin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-30· cited 10×
• Stouffer v. Staton
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-10-03· cited 8×
• Lindsey v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 5×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-29· cited 5×
• Lafontant v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-03· cited 5×
• Callahan v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-20· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• Frost v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-08-26· cited 157×
• State v. Brockman
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-21· cited 96×
• Beverly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-17· cited 41×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-28· cited 11×
• Brooks v. Warden
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-02-02· cited 6×
• Duffin v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-30· cited 5×
• Wimbush v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-06-15· cited 1×