Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/11/2005
Wynn v. State
Citations
- 879 A.2d 1097
- 388 Md. 423
- 2005 Md. LEXIS 477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The concept of inherent authority ... is grounded in the understanding that courts must possess certain powers in order to function as courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker, Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court· 2008-04-04· cited 60×
- Attorney Griev. Comm'n of Maryland v. Franz & LipowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-01· cited 53×
- Butler v. S & S PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-26· cited 32×
- Arey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-01· cited 31×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 26×
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-17· cited 26×
- Giddins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-12· cited 24×
- Weaver v. ZeniMax Media, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-25· cited 16×
- State v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-17· cited 13×
- In Re Elrich S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-24· cited 11×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-02-24· cited 11×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-27· cited 9×
- In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-01-03· cited 8×
- Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-30· cited 5×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-09· cited 4×
- Heit v. StansburyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-20· cited 3×
- Moultrie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29· cited 1×
Cites
71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 14,398×
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 2,455×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court· 1812-03-14· cited 761×
- COM. Ex Rel. CARROLL v. TATESupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-02-16· cited 189×
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-13· cited 186×
- Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. GouldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-16· cited 169×
- People v. RiveraIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 159×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Carroll v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-02-16· cited 140×
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-22· cited 132×
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-17· cited 117×
- Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-17· cited 114×
- In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BruenWashington Supreme Court· 1918-05-11· cited 98×
- Watson v. LillardMississippi Supreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 84×
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-15· cited 84×
- Pena v. District Court of Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-04-30· cited 83×
- MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-10-14· cited 83×
- Commission on Medical Discipline v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-09· cited 80×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.