Skip to main content

Best v. State

Citations

  • 556 A.2d 701
  • 79 Md. App. 241
  • 1989 Md. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that identity of a substance as cocaine may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • indicating that the legislature’s purpose in enacting §§ 10-1001— 10-1003 was to facilitate the admission of real evidence and the establishment of chain of custody, rather than to create new grounds for exclusion
  • “When[,] in our judgment[,] th[e] undergirding purpose [of guaranteeing the integrity of drug evidence] has clearly been served, we are not about to worry over whether there has been blind and literal obedience to the rule in the tradition of a Prussian drillmaster.” (Emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Garrity, Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.