United States v. Michael Joseph Orzechowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “we cannot say that these items were material within the meaning of Rule 16, or that their exclusion, if error, was not harmless”
• rejecting the claim that certain DEA internal memoranda were research reports that fell within the rule currently codified as Rule 16 (a)(1)(F)
• rejecting the claim that certain DEA internal memoranda were research reports that fell within the rule currently codified as Rule 16(a)(1)(F)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).