United States v. Steven Elmer Luschen, United States of America v. Wayne Bernard King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant had no legitimate expectation of privacy in a landing of a secure apartment building
• rejecting a different version of the cocaine isomer defense that involved different issues
• the Court should use a broader test than the “general acceptance” test in determining the admissibility of an expert
• “The fact that testimony would have been more proper for the case-in-chief does not preclude the testimony if it is proper both in the case-in-chief and in the rebuttal.”
• involving the second floor landing in a multiple-unit security building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).