Skip to main content

Nixon v. State

Citations

  • 105 A.2d 243
  • 204 Md. 475
  • 1954 Md. LEXIS 228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is necessary or desirable that the evidence remains in the same condition as originally found and that a challenge to the validity of a piece of evidence is a question of reasonable probability not certainty
  • holding that it is necessary or desirable that the evidence remains in the same condition as 6 originally found and that a challenge to the validity of a piece of evidence is a question of reasonable probability not certainty
  • reviewing trial court’s ruling excluding evidence based on inadequate chain of custody for an abuse of discretion
  • evidence concerning the “quarrelsome disposition” of the victim is properly excluded unless a proper foundation is laid
  • evidence concerning the \quarrelsome disposition\ of the victim is properly excluded unless a proper foundation is laid
  • evidence concerning the “quarrelsome disposition” of the victim is properly excluded unless a proper foundation is laid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson, Hammond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.