Supreme Court· 11/4/1997

Bates v. United States

Citations

522 U.S. 23
118 S. Ct. 285
139 L. Ed. 2d 215
1997 U.S. LEXIS 6704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that courts “ordinarily” should “resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face.”
holding that courts \ordinarily\ should \resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face\
holding that courts “ordinarily” should “resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face”
holding that courts “ordinarily” should “resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face.”
holding that courts “ordinarily” should “resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face”
holding that courts “ordinarily” should “resist reading words or elements into a statute that do not appear on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

224 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Bates v. United States

69 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.