Skip to main content
· 1/5/1995

United States v. Conley D. Wolfswinkel

Citations

  • 44 F.3d 782
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 181
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 49
  • 1995 WL 2434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after Dixon, a “strict application of the Blockburger test to the elements of the charged statutes is appropriate”
  • finding Seda non-viable in the wake of Dixon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Brunetti, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.