United States v. Elizabeth Kammer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding district court improperly denied request for additional 2 discovery where plaintiff had pursued discovery but opposing party caused delays
• “We may assume that the techniques claimed are 2 groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant, but that is not enough for eligibility.”
• “We may assume that the techniques claimed are 2 groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant, but that is not enough for eligibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).