United States v. Edwin Duncan, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Congress had the constitutional authority to enact 18 U.S.C. § 2511(l)(b)(iv) under the Commerce Clause
• finding error was not prejudicial as the foreman immediately squelched any discussion of dictionary definition
• finding error was not prejudicial as the foreman immediately squelched any discussion of dictionary definition
• “[I]t is sufficient that the defendant ... temporarily deprive[d] the bank of the possession, control or use of its funds.”
• “settled meaning” of misapplication, as used in § 656, is “conversion of bank funds to the use of the defendant or a third party”
• the circumstances in which juror misconduct can occur are probably as varied as all of human experience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).