Bates v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is appropriate to look to [DOL regulations] for persuasive guidance where the OPM regulations are unclear.”
• “While ‘caution dictates against simply importing DOL-created standards into the federal sector without any conscious rulemaking at either DOL or OPM,’ we believe it is appropriate to look to [DOL standards] for persuasive guidance where the OPM regulations are unclear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bull v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-09-27· cited 47×
• Abbey v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-05-04· cited 41×
• Martin v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2014-07-31· cited 19×
• Astor v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-11-13· cited 14×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Adams v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1998-01-30· cited 13×
• Adams v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-11-30· cited 8×
• Bates v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-01-15· cited 8×