Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/11/1985
Bates v. State
Citations
- 494 A.2d 976
- 64 Md. App. 279
- 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- limited remand to determine whether Fourth Amendment violation occurred and evidence should have been suppressed
- passenger in taxi-cab, who had right to choose the destination and the route of the cab, and to exclude others, had sufficient control of the vehicle to confer standing
- “The defendant, as the proponent, has, upon timely challenge, the burden of establishing standing[.]” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Wilner, Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-24· cited 129×
- Chapa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-08· cited 85×
- Herbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-02-02· cited 32×
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-06· cited 27×
- People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-03· cited 22×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-01· cited 18×
- United States v. SantiagoS.D. New York· 1996-12-31· cited 11×
- Coomes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-03-03· cited 8×
- Colin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-01· cited 8×
- Connelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-02· cited 6×
- Moreland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-06-10· cited 6×
- Narain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-02· cited 3×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-10-01· cited 1×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-11-21
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- Rios v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 586×
- Hans Rees' Sons, Inc. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1931-04-13· cited 311×
- Gill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-12· cited 72×
- Warrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 43×
- Wiener v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-06-09· cited 36×
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-15· cited 30×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-13· cited 30×
- Mahammitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-15· cited 17×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-15· cited 16×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.