Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/2/2001
Herbert v. State
Citations
- 766 A.2d 190
- 136 Md. App. 458
- 2001 Md. App. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mail addressed to defendant at the premises was circumstantial evidence that defendant had possessory interest in premises
- “When the State has procured evidence of guilt by the favored and preferred modality of a warranted search, it is rewarded by a presumption of validity in favor of its warrant application.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-08· cited 70×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-09· cited 52×
- State v. AlexanderUtah Supreme Court· 2012-05-04· cited 31×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-07· cited 29×
- Conboy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-03-02· cited 24×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 24×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-21· cited 23×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-12· cited 23×
- Facon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 21×
- Larocca v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-29· cited 17×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-06· cited 17×
- State v. RileyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-13· cited 12×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-27· cited 11×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-06· cited 11×
- Pringle v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-28· cited 10×
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-15· cited 7×
- Volkomer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-27· cited 6×
- Purnell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-04· cited 6×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-29· cited 5×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-06· cited 5×
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 885×
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 854×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-03· cited 174×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-18· cited 140×
- State v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-18· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.