Wiener v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of an earlier version of Md. Rule 4-342(d) was a harmless error when the only choices at the sentencing hearing were for the court to impose the death penalty or a life sentence, and the court imposed the lesser sentence
• ordering a limited remand to reconsider defendant’s motion for dismissal of his indictment due to ineffective assistance of counsel
• involving Rule 772 c 1, which requires that the State disclose to the defense any information which the State expects to present at the sentencing hearing
• involving Rule 772 c 1, which requires that the State disclose to the defense any information which the State expects to present at the sentencing hearing
• erroneous ruling on appellant’s motion to dismiss curable by limited remand because evidence supporting or opposing motion was collateral to the criminal trial
• “Here, the hearing to determine the facts underlying Wiener’s motion claiming denial of the right to the effective assistance of counsel was collateral to the criminal trial itself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).